The evolution of trade dynamics in the digital age has brought forth a landscape filled with both opportunities and challenges. This study delves into the realm of trade transformation within the context of the digital era, employing the theoretical framework presented by Anthony Giddens. Giddens’ concepts surrounding modernity, the structure of society, and the role of agents in shaping modern-day interactions serve as the lens through which this analysis navigates the multifaceted landscape of contemporary trade. This study investigates how digital advancements have reshaped trade mechanisms, revealing a landscape marked by significant opportunities for growth alongside challenges stemming from rapid technological change. Through the description of the opportunities presented by digital technologies, as well as the obstacles they introduce, the study provides insights into the dual nature of trade evolution in the digital era. It emphasizes the need for a nuanced understanding of how digital tools and platforms are integrated into trade activities, and how these integrations affect both the opportunities available for economic expansion and the challenges of adapting to a swiftly transforming commerce ecosystem. By examining the interplay between digital advancements and trade mechanisms, this research sheds light on the intricate balance between opportunities for growth and the challenges posed by rapid technological evolution, offering insights crucial for navigating the complexities of today’s global trade environment.
Author: Ferdi Yufriadi, Fadilla Syahriani, Abdullah A Afifi
-
Nurcholish Madjid’s Neo-Modernism in Substantive Islamic Movements in Indonesia
At this time, there is a stagnation of thought among Muslims regarding whether the concept of an Islamic state is still being debated or not. Islamic socio-political movements are divided into two streams, namely Substantive Islam and Symbolic Islam. Nurcholish Madjid firmly rejects the politicization of Islam in the interests of political groups that are members of Islamic parties. With the motto: “Islam Yes, Islamic Party No!”. According to Nurcholish Madjid, Islamic political power is not always related to Islamic parties. He tries to convey a more substantial view of Islam, not just symbolism. Seeing the current situation, the criticism conveyed by Nurcholish Madjid is still very relevant. This research was conducted to explore the relevance of Nurcholish Madjid’s thoughts on state politics in Indonesia by considering the current situation. Based on the results of this research, it was revealed that Nurcholish Madjid chose Islam which is more substantial than just symbolism. This has its roots in the universal values of Islam, not just the symbol of the “Islamic party” itself. If we look at the current situation, the criticism raised by Nurcholish Madjid is still relevant because, at this time, the politicization of religion is generally used to attack political opponents or increase party electability. Instead of using Islam as a moral guide for politics, political elites tend to use Muslims for individual interests.
